Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Rajasthan High Court addressed the issue of refunding unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) used for zero-rated supply of goods. The petitioner sought refund under the "Any Other" category on the GST portal for Dec. 2018. Upon realizing an arithmetical error in previous refund applications, supplementary applications were submitted. Citing a Gujarat High Court decision, the High Court held that substantive entitlement cannot be denied due to technical errors. The petition was disposed of, allowing manual submission of refund applications for the remaining amount. The respondent authorities were directed to scrutinize the claims in accordance with the law.
The Rajasthan High Court addressed the issue of refunding unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) used for zero-rated supply of goods. The petitioner sought refund under the "Any Other" category on the GST portal for Dec. 2018. Upon realizing an arithmetical error in previous refund applications, supplementary applications were submitted. Citing a Gujarat High Court decision, the High Court held that substantive entitlement cannot be denied due to technical errors. The petition was disposed of, allowing manual submission of refund applications for the remaining amount. The respondent authorities were directed to scrutinize the claims in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
