Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3301 to 3320 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Madras High Court addressed a case involving a direction for recredit or refund of amounts recovered u/s assessment orders. The court found that the respondents did not adequately justify the use of the proviso to Section 78, entitling the petitioner to a refund. The petition was allowed, directing the first respondent to refund or recredit the amount to the petitioner's Electronic Cash or Credit Ledgers within one month from the date of the order.
The Madras High Court addressed a case involving a direction for recredit or refund of amounts recovered u/s assessment orders. The court found that the respondents did not adequately justify the use of the proviso to Section 78, entitling the petitioner to a refund. The petition was allowed, directing the first respondent to refund or recredit the amount to the petitioner's Electronic Cash or Credit Ledgers within one month from the date of the order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4813 
Join Channel 
