Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The Madras High Court addressed a case involving a direction for recredit or refund of amounts recovered u/s assessment orders. The court found that the respondents did not adequately justify the use of the proviso to Section 78, entitling the petitioner to a refund. The petition was allowed, directing the first respondent to refund or recredit the amount to the petitioner's Electronic Cash or Credit Ledgers within one month from the date of the order.
The Madras High Court addressed a case involving a direction for recredit or refund of amounts recovered u/s assessment orders. The court found that the respondents did not adequately justify the use of the proviso to Section 78, entitling the petitioner to a refund. The petition was allowed, directing the first respondent to refund or recredit the amount to the petitioner's Electronic Cash or Credit Ledgers within one month from the date of the order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
