Trademark depreciation and section 14A adjustments: ITAT applies consistency, independent book-profit computation, and no disallowance without exempt ...
Rebuttable search presumptions and corroboration standards shaped deletion of unsubstantiated additions, while rental income and limited profit estima...
The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the assessment order u/s 143(3) to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271D. In this case, the AO failed to record satisfaction for penalty u/s 271D for the relevant assessment years. The tribunal referred to the case law of Jai Laxmi Rice Mills and concluded that penalty u/s 271D was not warranted. Consequently, the penalty imposed u/s 271D for both assessment years was deleted, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed.
The ITAT Delhi held that the levy of penalty u/s 271D without valid satisfaction for alleged violation u/s 269SS is not justified. The AO must record satisfaction in the assessment order u/s 143(3) to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271D. In this case, the AO failed to record satisfaction for penalty u/s 271D for the relevant assessment years. The tribunal referred to the case law of Jai Laxmi Rice Mills and concluded that penalty u/s 271D was not warranted. Consequently, the penalty imposed u/s 271D for both assessment years was deleted, and the appeals of the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
