Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Delhi addressed the validity of additions in an assessment u/s 153A without incriminating material post a search u/s 132. Citing Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd., the Tribunal held that if no incriminating material is found during a search, the AO cannot assess or reassess completed/unabated assessments. Consequently, additions made without such material cannot stand. The Tribunal deleted the additions by the AO, including commission income, as they lacked a basis in incriminating material. Ground no. 1 was allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi addressed the validity of additions in an assessment u/s 153A without incriminating material post a search u/s 132. Citing Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd., the Tribunal held that if no incriminating material is found during a search, the AO cannot assess or reassess completed/unabated assessments. Consequently, additions made without such material cannot stand. The Tribunal deleted the additions by the AO, including commission income, as they lacked a basis in incriminating material. Ground no. 1 was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.