Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT Delhi addressed the validity of additions in an assessment u/s 153A without incriminating material post a search u/s 132. Citing Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd., the Tribunal held that if no incriminating material is found during a search, the AO cannot assess or reassess completed/unabated assessments. Consequently, additions made without such material cannot stand. The Tribunal deleted the additions by the AO, including commission income, as they lacked a basis in incriminating material. Ground no. 1 was allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Delhi addressed the validity of additions in an assessment u/s 153A without incriminating material post a search u/s 132. Citing Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd., the Tribunal held that if no incriminating material is found during a search, the AO cannot assess or reassess completed/unabated assessments. Consequently, additions made without such material cannot stand. The Tribunal deleted the additions by the AO, including commission income, as they lacked a basis in incriminating material. Ground no. 1 was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
