Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposits in demonetized currency. The appellant demonstrated substantial cash sales supported by audited books, invoices, VAT records, and stock tally. The CIT(A) confirmed the regularity of cash sales over multiple assessment years. The tribunal found no defects in sales, purchases, or stock records, with substantial cash sales in all years. The AO accepted most sales except for a specific period. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal after thorough review of the record and arguments.
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposits in demonetized currency. The appellant demonstrated substantial cash sales supported by audited books, invoices, VAT records, and stock tally. The CIT(A) confirmed the regularity of cash sales over multiple assessment years. The tribunal found no defects in sales, purchases, or stock records, with substantial cash sales in all years. The AO accepted most sales except for a specific period. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal after thorough review of the record and arguments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
