Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposits in demonetized currency. The appellant demonstrated substantial cash sales supported by audited books, invoices, VAT records, and stock tally. The CIT(A) confirmed the regularity of cash sales over multiple assessment years. The tribunal found no defects in sales, purchases, or stock records, with substantial cash sales in all years. The AO accepted most sales except for a specific period. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal after thorough review of the record and arguments.
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of addition u/s 68 for unexplained cash deposits in demonetized currency. The appellant demonstrated substantial cash sales supported by audited books, invoices, VAT records, and stock tally. The CIT(A) confirmed the regularity of cash sales over multiple assessment years. The tribunal found no defects in sales, purchases, or stock records, with substantial cash sales in all years. The AO accepted most sales except for a specific period. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal after thorough review of the record and arguments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
