Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Share valuation method choice protects DCF valuations from replacement with NAV, though projections remain open to scrutiny.
    Penalty immunity requires reconsideration where rectification removes the assessment demand and leaves a refund instead.
    Under-reporting penalty applies when taxable income is not returned, even if reassessment disclosure is accepted without additions.
    Benami RTGS credits unsupported by independent evidence justified attachment, while unproven prejudice defeated the natural justice challenge.
    Prospective sugar export prohibition required registered letters of credit; private contracts and export quotas created no enforceable continuation ri...
    Brand rate drawback for bus bodies may coexist with DEPB where duplicate duty reimbursement is not established by evidence.
    Made-up textile article classification governs triangular umbrella panels, while full customs disclosure prevents extended limitation in classificatio...
    Abetment penalties require proof that a Customs Broker representative knowingly facilitated improper importation of prohibited goods.
    Actual user conditions prohibit disguised sales of duty-free inputs through arrangements labelled as job work.
    Abetment of attempted export requires proven positive assistance or knowledge; penalties cannot rest on unsupported allegations of concealment.
    Unsubmitted arbitral award claims are extinguished by approved resolution plans, while court-deposited security remains the corporate debtor's asset.
    Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
    Pre-existing operational debt dispute and post-admission settlement led to reversal of CIRP admission and closure of insolvency proceedings.
    Poultry cage components classification restored as parts of poultry-keeping machinery rather than iron and steel structural goods.
    Admitted cheque signatures raise debt presumptions, while revisional courts cannot reassess concurrent evidence without material jurisdictional error.
    Tariff rate quota applications under India-Oman CEPA open with product-specific documentation requirements for eligible imports.
    Standard Input Output Norms for chemical and pharmaceutical exports enable direct Advance Authorisations and uniform input entitlement assessment.
    SCMTR-only manifest filing replaces supplementary IGM and EGM processes at New Mangalore and Karwar Ports.
    Doctrine of merger does not arise from SLP dismissal, while challenges remain premature until remanded issues are decided.
    Jurisdictional challenges to GST adjudication may bypass alternative remedies, requiring the adjudicating authority to decide its competence first.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments,...

      ITAT Ahmedabad Affirms Arm's Length Price Using CUP Method; Dismisses Revenue's Objections on TP Adjustments.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxJune 4, 2024Case LawsAT
      The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments, focusing on royalty, management fees, and IT allocation costs. The tribunal upheld the use of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method by the assessee, finding it suitable for determining the Arm's Length Price (ALP). The payment of royalty at 5% was deemed comparable with rates allowed by the Indian Regulatory Authority. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's contentions on royalty payments. Regarding management fees, the tribunal found the markup of 15% justified based on actual costs incurred. The tribunal also upheld the payment for IT services, technical support, and management fees, noting detailed reimbursement provided by the assessee. The CIT(A) decisions were upheld, with no interference warranted. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's challenges on all three aspects of TP adjustments.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax