Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment, reliable financial data, and careful review of working capital and receivables adjustmen...
Transfer pricing rules require benchmarking corporate guarantees and associated-enterprise advances, while invalid domestic-transaction adjustments ca...
Prospective sugar export prohibition required registered letters of credit; private contracts and export quotas created no enforceable continuation ri...
Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues....
Disallowance of royalty payment & TDS u/s 195 upheld in favor of assessee. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D. ESI contribution payment issue restored to CIT(A).
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
