Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues....
Disallowance of royalty payment & TDS u/s 195 upheld in favor of assessee. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D. ESI contribution payment issue restored to CIT(A).
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
