Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues....
Disallowance of royalty payment & TDS u/s 195 upheld in favor of assessee. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D. ESI contribution payment issue restored to CIT(A).
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
