Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues....
Disallowance of royalty payment & TDS u/s 195 upheld in favor of assessee. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D. ESI contribution payment issue restored to CIT(A).
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
The ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues. The disallowance of royalty payment was deemed genuine based on a trademark agreement and sales linkage. TDS u/s 195 disallowance was rejected as per precedent. No disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D due to no dividend income. ESI contribution delay was upheld based on a Supreme Court judgment. The issue of ESI payment date was referred back to CIT(A) for fresh consideration. Income understatement was justified due to TDS deductions in previous years. The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
