Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits, leading to scrutiny under CASS. The tribunal found that deposits made before demonetisation were included beyond the limited scrutiny scope. Cash deposits during demonetisation were claimed as gifts from parents. Partial relief was granted based on CBDT Instruction No.03/2017, allowing relief for deposits up to specified limits without further verification. Further relief of Rs. 5,00,000 was granted for pre-demonetisation deposits, while the remaining addition was upheld due to lack of evidence on transactions during demonetisation. The tribunal partly allowed the assessee's grounds.
The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits, leading to scrutiny under CASS. The tribunal found that deposits made before demonetisation were included beyond the limited scrutiny scope. Cash deposits during demonetisation were claimed as gifts from parents. Partial relief was granted based on CBDT Instruction No.03/2017, allowing relief for deposits up to specified limits without further verification. Further relief of Rs. 5,00,000 was granted for pre-demonetisation deposits, while the remaining addition was upheld due to lack of evidence on transactions during demonetisation. The tribunal partly allowed the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
