Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits, leading to scrutiny under CASS. The tribunal found that deposits made before demonetisation were included beyond the limited scrutiny scope. Cash deposits during demonetisation were claimed as gifts from parents. Partial relief was granted based on CBDT Instruction No.03/2017, allowing relief for deposits up to specified limits without further verification. Further relief of Rs. 5,00,000 was granted for pre-demonetisation deposits, while the remaining addition was upheld due to lack of evidence on transactions during demonetisation. The tribunal partly allowed the assessee's grounds.
The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits, leading to scrutiny under CASS. The tribunal found that deposits made before demonetisation were included beyond the limited scrutiny scope. Cash deposits during demonetisation were claimed as gifts from parents. Partial relief was granted based on CBDT Instruction No.03/2017, allowing relief for deposits up to specified limits without further verification. Further relief of Rs. 5,00,000 was granted for pre-demonetisation deposits, while the remaining addition was upheld due to lack of evidence on transactions during demonetisation. The tribunal partly allowed the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
