Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of rectification of mistake u/s 154 beyond the limitation period. The AO failed to fulfill the statutory duty by not passing an order on the application u/s 154 within the prescribed time. The tribunal held that the appellant had the right to appeal u/s 246A due to the AO's failure. The CBDT circular allows corrections in disputed arrear demands even after the limitation period. The tribunal directed the AO to consider and dispose of the application filed u/s 154 in 2014. The tribunal emphasized that failure to fulfill statutory obligations cannot prejudice the taxpayer's interests.
The ITAT Delhi addressed the issue of rectification of mistake u/s 154 beyond the limitation period. The AO failed to fulfill the statutory duty by not passing an order on the application u/s 154 within the prescribed time. The tribunal held that the appellant had the right to appeal u/s 246A due to the AO's failure. The CBDT circular allows corrections in disputed arrear demands even after the limitation period. The tribunal directed the AO to consider and dispose of the application filed u/s 154 in 2014. The tribunal emphasized that failure to fulfill statutory obligations cannot prejudice the taxpayer's interests.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.