Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Page of 4787
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95724 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed various issues. On the 40(a)(ia) addition, the assessee failed to provide necessary details justifying deductions disallowed in earlier years due to non-TDS deduction. The Tribunal emphasized the need for supporting documents and allowed deductions on actual payment basis. Regarding u/s 36(1)(va), the Tribunal dismissed the appeal based on a precedent. For unsecured loan waiver, the Tribunal held that waiver of loan is not taxable u/s 28(iv) as it's a cash benefit. The Tribunal directed deletion of the addition u/s 41(1) as neither the AO nor CIT(A) invoked this provision. The assessee was granted another opportunity to present their case before the AO.
The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed various issues. On the 40(a)(ia) addition, the assessee failed to provide necessary details justifying deductions disallowed in earlier years due to non-TDS deduction. The Tribunal emphasized the need for supporting documents and allowed deductions on actual payment basis. Regarding u/s 36(1)(va), the Tribunal dismissed the appeal based on a precedent. For unsecured loan waiver, the Tribunal held that waiver of loan is not taxable u/s 28(iv) as it's a cash benefit. The Tribunal directed deletion of the addition u/s 41(1) as neither the AO nor CIT(A) invoked this provision. The assessee was granted another opportunity to present their case before the AO.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
