Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Indore ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54B for agricultural lands bought in the wife and family's names, but funded entirely by the assessee. Citing SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN case, the tribunal held that Section 54B allows investments in the name of spouse and minors. Since the assessee used own funds from the sale of original asset, the deduction cannot be denied based on the lands being in family members' names. Assessee's appeal allowed.
The ITAT Indore ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54B for agricultural lands bought in the wife and family's names, but funded entirely by the assessee. Citing SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN case, the tribunal held that Section 54B allows investments in the name of spouse and minors. Since the assessee used own funds from the sale of original asset, the deduction cannot be denied based on the lands being in family members' names. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
