Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The case concerns the liability of an exporter to pay GST on export freight as CGST & SGST or IGST. The ruling states that post the sunset clause on ocean/air freight, such activities became taxable under GST from 1.10.2022. The tax liability depends on the 'place of supply,' which, in this case, is 'outside India,' making it an inter-state supply subject to IGST. If the service provider, the shipping line, has an office in Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu, the liability shifts to CGST/SGST for intra-state supply. The exporter is not liable for GST as it receives the service as input for its CIF basis exports. The ruling does not address the liability of the shipping line for GST.
The case concerns the liability of an exporter to pay GST on export freight as CGST & SGST or IGST. The ruling states that post the sunset clause on ocean/air freight, such activities became taxable under GST from 1.10.2022. The tax liability depends on the 'place of supply,' which, in this case, is 'outside India,' making it an inter-state supply subject to IGST. If the service provider, the shipping line, has an office in Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu, the liability shifts to CGST/SGST for intra-state supply. The exporter is not liable for GST as it receives the service as input for its CIF basis exports. The ruling does not address the liability of the shipping line for GST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.