Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The case concerns the liability of an exporter to pay GST on export freight as CGST & SGST or IGST. The ruling states that post the sunset clause on ocean/air freight, such activities became taxable under GST from 1.10.2022. The tax liability depends on the 'place of supply,' which, in this case, is 'outside India,' making it an inter-state supply subject to IGST. If the service provider, the shipping line, has an office in Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu, the liability shifts to CGST/SGST for intra-state supply. The exporter is not liable for GST as it receives the service as input for its CIF basis exports. The ruling does not address the liability of the shipping line for GST.
The case concerns the liability of an exporter to pay GST on export freight as CGST & SGST or IGST. The ruling states that post the sunset clause on ocean/air freight, such activities became taxable under GST from 1.10.2022. The tax liability depends on the 'place of supply,' which, in this case, is 'outside India,' making it an inter-state supply subject to IGST. If the service provider, the shipping line, has an office in Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu, the liability shifts to CGST/SGST for intra-state supply. The exporter is not liable for GST as it receives the service as input for its CIF basis exports. The ruling does not address the liability of the shipping line for GST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.