Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.