Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
