Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
