Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
CESTAT New Delhi held that an aircraft used for transporting persons for remuneration falls under public transport, not private use. Referring to M/s.V.R.L. Logistics, it determined the aircraft's usage as non-scheduled (Passenger) service, complying with Condition No.104 of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. The Tribunal upheld the decision, dismissing appeals as no violation occurred, resolving issues of confiscation, interest, and penalty. The definition of 'Air Transport Service' and 'Scheduled Air Transport Service' from Aircraft Rules guided the classification, emphasizing the distinction between private and public transport aircraft.
CESTAT New Delhi held that an aircraft used for transporting persons for remuneration falls under public transport, not private use. Referring to M/s.V.R.L. Logistics, it determined the aircraft's usage as non-scheduled (Passenger) service, complying with Condition No.104 of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. The Tribunal upheld the decision, dismissing appeals as no violation occurred, resolving issues of confiscation, interest, and penalty. The definition of 'Air Transport Service' and 'Scheduled Air Transport Service' from Aircraft Rules guided the classification, emphasizing the distinction between private and public transport aircraft.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
