Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT Hyderabad upheld the estimation of income and profit, dismissing Revenue's appeal. The profit was modified to 11.5%. Deduction u/s 80-IA(4) was disallowed based on precedent. Disallowance of interest u/s 14A r.w.r 8D and section 36(1)(iii) was rejected due to business exigency. Interest earned on FDs was not taxed as it was already reduced from finance charges. Cash payments u/s 40A(3) were justified due to lack of banking facilities at remote sites. Business promotion expenses were allowed as connected to business promotion, given income estimation. The findings of CIT(A) were upheld, and Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The ITAT Hyderabad upheld the estimation of income and profit, dismissing Revenue's appeal. The profit was modified to 11.5%. Deduction u/s 80-IA(4) was disallowed based on precedent. Disallowance of interest u/s 14A r.w.r 8D and section 36(1)(iii) was rejected due to business exigency. Interest earned on FDs was not taxed as it was already reduced from finance charges. Cash payments u/s 40A(3) were justified due to lack of banking facilities at remote sites. Business promotion expenses were allowed as connected to business promotion, given income estimation. The findings of CIT(A) were upheld, and Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.