Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided by the assessee regarding sales of bullion, criticizing the AO for not seeking further details. The revenue's objection to non-admission of evidence due to lack of documentation was dismissed. The CIT(A) rightly admitted additional evidence, rejecting the department's objection. Regarding unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, the appellant explained deposits as sale proceeds from bullion trading, earning a 1% commission. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision to apply a net profit rate of 1% on total deposits, considering the nature of the business and standard accounting principles. CIT(A) applied a net profit rate of 1.2% to cover possible revenue leakages, which was deemed fair and reasonable. The tribunal upheld the application of the 1.2% NP rate for estimating commission earned on bullion sales.
The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided by the assessee regarding sales of bullion, criticizing the AO for not seeking further details. The revenue's objection to non-admission of evidence due to lack of documentation was dismissed. The CIT(A) rightly admitted additional evidence, rejecting the department's objection. Regarding unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, the appellant explained deposits as sale proceeds from bullion trading, earning a 1% commission. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision to apply a net profit rate of 1% on total deposits, considering the nature of the business and standard accounting principles. CIT(A) applied a net profit rate of 1.2% to cover possible revenue leakages, which was deemed fair and reasonable. The tribunal upheld the application of the 1.2% NP rate for estimating commission earned on bullion sales.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
