Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamil Nadu addressed the issue of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for a Rotary parking system. The ruling clarified that the car parking system, consisting of constituent parts, is not supplied as a whole. The system is erected on a specific foundation, making it immovable property permanently attached to the earth. The intention to retain the structure permanently on own land precludes it from being considered movable. The ruling also determined that the Rotary Car Parking System qualifies as an addition to immovable property, falling under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, making ITC inadmissible. Therefore, ITC is not allowable on the installation of the Rotary Parking System as per Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Acts 2017.
The Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamil Nadu addressed the issue of Input Tax Credit (ITC) for a Rotary parking system. The ruling clarified that the car parking system, consisting of constituent parts, is not supplied as a whole. The system is erected on a specific foundation, making it immovable property permanently attached to the earth. The intention to retain the structure permanently on own land precludes it from being considered movable. The ruling also determined that the Rotary Car Parking System qualifies as an addition to immovable property, falling under Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, making ITC inadmissible. Therefore, ITC is not allowable on the installation of the Rotary Parking System as per Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST/TNGST Acts 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.