Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Input tax credit allowed for concrete VCV tower treated as structural support of plant and machinery, not blocked civil construction.
    Transfer pricing adjustment: Bright Line Test rejected, royalty issues treated as covered, and comparable exclusion found factual.
    Stamp duty valuation governed reassessment limitation, and the extended period applied because the petitioner's share crossed the threshold.
    Reassessment limitation upheld where response time was excluded under section 149 and survey material qualified as an asset.
    Peak credit, TDS disallowance and work-in-progress adjustments shaped the tribunal's tax rulings on business receipts.
    Treaty benefit for separate capital gains sources allowed; DTAA-exempt share gains cannot be forced into Act-based loss set-off.
    TNMM transfer pricing principles reshape comparables, working capital, royalty, services and receivables adjustments in a mixed ITAT ruling.
    Deduction for standard-asset provisioning under section 36(1)(viia) allowed where RBI norms are followed and books reflect the provision.
    Beneficial leave-encashment exemption amendment applied retrospectively to pending matters, extending the higher ceiling.
    Bona fide share transfer to wholly owned subsidiary qualifies for section 47(iv) exemption despite tax benefit.
    Permanent establishment and make-available test rejected for reinsurance and support service receipts, deleting the tax additions.
    Section 54 exemption can be claimed when capital gains are fully used to buy new property before filing a belated return.
    Evidentiary support and cross-examination rights defeat additions based on WhatsApp chats, retracted statements, and presumptions.
    Unexplained cash can qualify as benami property under the PBPT Act despite proposed income-tax disclosure.
    Contempt for post-judgment anti-dumping duty collection rejected after the court accepted inadvertent misinterpretation and noted refund steps.
    Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
    Extended limitation under customs law failed where disclosure was made in the bill of entry and intent to evade duty was not proved.
    Tariff classification dispute upheld for textile-based laminate goods, but confiscation and penalty were set aside.
    Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
    Separate billing for hotel rooms and meals supports distinct abatements, making the service tax demand and penalty unsustainable.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The case involved the interpretation of Article 366 (29A) of the...

Court Clarifies Right to Use Goods in Launch Vehicle Contracts; Deems Them Service Contracts, Orders Refund Process.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Service Tax June 1, 2024 Case Laws HC
The case involved the interpretation of Article 366 (29A) of the Constitution regarding the transfer of right of use goods. The High Court examined whether contracts for hiring launch vehicles for a bridge project constituted a sale or a service under Section 65 (105) (zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994. The court held that the contracts were service contracts as the essential elements of a sale were absent. The court emphasized that the control over the vessels remained with the petitioners, making it a service contract. Citing the case of M/s K. P. Mozika, the court concluded that there was no transfer of right of use, and the contracts fell within the ambit of service contracts. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the respondents were directed to process the application for refund. The writ petition was allowed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax