CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the Appellant is entitled to benefit...

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the Appellant is entitled to benefit u/s Rule 6(3A) of CCR, 2004 even if the option wasn't initially exercised. Service tax on logistic charges was set aside as VAT was paid. Demand on toll collection was also set aside. New demands for 2015-16 and 2016-17 were not sustainable. No short payment on works contract services. Incentives received were not taxable under business auxiliary services. Demand for 2012-13 to 2014-15 was not sustainable due to limitation. Interest and penalty not imposable if demand is not sustainable. Partial demand confirmed under Rule 6(3)(A) was set aside. Appeals allowed with consequential relief.