Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving seized documents by the AO with jurisdiction over the person. The tribunal noted that the initiation u/s 153C(1) was for AY 2021-22, not AY 2020-21, as the documents were handed over on 16-03-2021. Citing precedents like Jasjit Singh and RRJ Securities Ltd, the tribunal deemed the assessment order invalid and quashed it, setting aside the appeal order.
The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving seized documents by the AO with jurisdiction over the person. The tribunal noted that the initiation u/s 153C(1) was for AY 2021-22, not AY 2020-21, as the documents were handed over on 16-03-2021. Citing precedents like Jasjit Singh and RRJ Securities Ltd, the tribunal deemed the assessment order invalid and quashed it, setting aside the appeal order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.