Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving seized documents by the AO with jurisdiction over the person. The tribunal noted that the initiation u/s 153C(1) was for AY 2021-22, not AY 2020-21, as the documents were handed over on 16-03-2021. Citing precedents like Jasjit Singh and RRJ Securities Ltd, the tribunal deemed the assessment order invalid and quashed it, setting aside the appeal order.
The ITAT Amritsar addressed the validity of initiating proceedings u/s 153C(1) instead of 143(3). It was held that initiation of Section 153C occurs upon receiving seized documents by the AO with jurisdiction over the person. The tribunal noted that the initiation u/s 153C(1) was for AY 2021-22, not AY 2020-21, as the documents were handed over on 16-03-2021. Citing precedents like Jasjit Singh and RRJ Securities Ltd, the tribunal deemed the assessment order invalid and quashed it, setting aside the appeal order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.