Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The case involves a dispute regarding the waiver of Rural Development Cess (RDC) for Assessment Year 2002-03. The petitioner sought installment payment for Rs. 66,269 tax under AP GST Act, but the court stated it cannot order installment payment. Regarding RDC of Rs. 3,00,514, petitioner claimed exemption based on government orders, but respondent argued against it, stating petitioner already collected RDC from FCI. Court agreed with respondent, emphasizing that granting exemption would lead to undue enrichment. Petitioner's failure to challenge the claim led to dismissal of the writ petition.
The case involves a dispute regarding the waiver of Rural Development Cess (RDC) for Assessment Year 2002-03. The petitioner sought installment payment for Rs. 66,269 tax under AP GST Act, but the court stated it cannot order installment payment. Regarding RDC of Rs. 3,00,514, petitioner claimed exemption based on government orders, but respondent argued against it, stating petitioner already collected RDC from FCI. Court agreed with respondent, emphasizing that granting exemption would lead to undue enrichment. Petitioner's failure to challenge the claim led to dismissal of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
