Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
The case involves a challenge to the extension of the time limit for GST assessment u/s 73 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court considered the term 'force majeure' as defined in the Explanation to Section 168A of the Act. Previous extensions were noted. Several High Courts provided interim relief to noticees/assessees, allowing proceedings but no final orders or recovery. The court decided that recovery of the assessed amount shall not be enforced until further orders. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The case involves a challenge to the extension of the time limit for GST assessment u/s 73 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court considered the term 'force majeure' as defined in the Explanation to Section 168A of the Act. Previous extensions were noted. Several High Courts provided interim relief to noticees/assessees, allowing proceedings but no final orders or recovery. The court decided that recovery of the assessed amount shall not be enforced until further orders. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
