Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The High Court quashed prosecution against petitioners-accused u/s Central Excise Act 1944 and IPC. No Dues-Discharge Certificate issued, Sabka Vishwas Scheme applied. Prosecution continued despite remittance of liability and withdrawal application. Liability liquidated under the Scheme. Prosecution burdened court docket, caused unwarranted suffering. Complaint quashed, petitioners acquitted. Case disposed of.
The High Court quashed prosecution against petitioners-accused u/s Central Excise Act 1944 and IPC. No Dues-Discharge Certificate issued, Sabka Vishwas Scheme applied. Prosecution continued despite remittance of liability and withdrawal application. Liability liquidated under the Scheme. Prosecution burdened court docket, caused unwarranted suffering. Complaint quashed, petitioners acquitted. Case disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.