Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a...
Validity of pre-show cause notices u/s 74 since not uploaded in the View notices and orders - Petition not maintainable due to availability of appeal remedy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.