Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a...
Validity of pre-show cause notices u/s 74 since not uploaded in the View notices and orders - Petition not maintainable due to availability of appeal remedy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.