Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
