Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
