Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
