Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
