Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3101 to 3120 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax proposal related to discrepancies in GSTR returns and Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, requiring the petitioner to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, granting the petitioner an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
