Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication, violating natural justice. The petitioner, citing turnover below threshold, sought a chance to contest. Evidence of tax payment was presented. The Court noted lack of response to show cause notice led to tax confirmation. Orders were set aside pending verification of tax payment. Petitioner allowed two weeks to reply to notices. Petition disposed off, emphasizing the right to contest on merits.
The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication, violating natural justice. The petitioner, citing turnover below threshold, sought a chance to contest. Evidence of tax payment was presented. The Court noted lack of response to show cause notice led to tax confirmation. Orders were set aside pending verification of tax payment. Petitioner allowed two weeks to reply to notices. Petition disposed off, emphasizing the right to contest on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.