Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication, violating natural justice. The petitioner, citing turnover below threshold, sought a chance to contest. Evidence of tax payment was presented. The Court noted lack of response to show cause notice led to tax confirmation. Orders were set aside pending verification of tax payment. Petitioner allowed two weeks to reply to notices. Petition disposed off, emphasizing the right to contest on merits.
The High Court addressed a case involving penalty for non-filing of annual return under the GST laws. The petitioner argued that notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication, violating natural justice. The petitioner, citing turnover below threshold, sought a chance to contest. Evidence of tax payment was presented. The Court noted lack of response to show cause notice led to tax confirmation. Orders were set aside pending verification of tax payment. Petitioner allowed two weeks to reply to notices. Petition disposed off, emphasizing the right to contest on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.