Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
CESTAT New Delhi held that providing Corporate Guarantee without consideration is not taxable u/s 66B of Finance Act, 1994 as it lacks 'provider' and 'consideration' elements. Profit/markup is taxable under service tax based on precedent cases like M/s Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd. The tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the revenue appeal.
CESTAT New Delhi held that providing Corporate Guarantee without consideration is not taxable u/s 66B of Finance Act, 1994 as it lacks 'provider' and 'consideration' elements. Profit/markup is taxable under service tax based on precedent cases like M/s Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd. The tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the revenue appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.