Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
CESTAT New Delhi held that providing Corporate Guarantee without consideration is not taxable u/s 66B of Finance Act, 1994 as it lacks 'provider' and 'consideration' elements. Profit/markup is taxable under service tax based on precedent cases like M/s Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd. The tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the revenue appeal.
CESTAT New Delhi held that providing Corporate Guarantee without consideration is not taxable u/s 66B of Finance Act, 1994 as it lacks 'provider' and 'consideration' elements. Profit/markup is taxable under service tax based on precedent cases like M/s Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd. The tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the revenue appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.