Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
CESTAT New Delhi held that providing Corporate Guarantee without consideration is not taxable u/s 66B of Finance Act, 1994 as it lacks 'provider' and 'consideration' elements. Profit/markup is taxable under service tax based on precedent cases like M/s Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd. The tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the revenue appeal.
CESTAT New Delhi held that providing Corporate Guarantee without consideration is not taxable u/s 66B of Finance Act, 1994 as it lacks 'provider' and 'consideration' elements. Profit/markup is taxable under service tax based on precedent cases like M/s Tiger Logistics (India) Ltd. The tribunal upheld the order, dismissing the revenue appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.