Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The ITAT Jaipur, in a case involving unexplained money u/s 69A, found that the assessee, a widow running a medical retail store, deposited cash exceeding turnover. The cash was a combination of sales proceeds, loan, and turnover. The assessee, facing health challenges, relied on an accountant for tax filings. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence supporting the assessee's claim, directing the AO to compute cash credits vis-a-vis turnover. The turnover was to be examined based on corroborative evidence, with profit taxed at 8% u/s 44AD due to lack of comparative data. The AO was instructed to verify turnover using bank statements and the assessee to provide relevant documents. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Jaipur, in a case involving unexplained money u/s 69A, found that the assessee, a widow running a medical retail store, deposited cash exceeding turnover. The cash was a combination of sales proceeds, loan, and turnover. The assessee, facing health challenges, relied on an accountant for tax filings. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence supporting the assessee's claim, directing the AO to compute cash credits vis-a-vis turnover. The turnover was to be examined based on corroborative evidence, with profit taxed at 8% u/s 44AD due to lack of comparative data. The AO was instructed to verify turnover using bank statements and the assessee to provide relevant documents. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
