Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The ITAT Jaipur, in a case involving unexplained money u/s 69A, found that the assessee, a widow running a medical retail store, deposited cash exceeding turnover. The cash was a combination of sales proceeds, loan, and turnover. The assessee, facing health challenges, relied on an accountant for tax filings. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence supporting the assessee's claim, directing the AO to compute cash credits vis-a-vis turnover. The turnover was to be examined based on corroborative evidence, with profit taxed at 8% u/s 44AD due to lack of comparative data. The AO was instructed to verify turnover using bank statements and the assessee to provide relevant documents. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Jaipur, in a case involving unexplained money u/s 69A, found that the assessee, a widow running a medical retail store, deposited cash exceeding turnover. The cash was a combination of sales proceeds, loan, and turnover. The assessee, facing health challenges, relied on an accountant for tax filings. The Tribunal admitted additional evidence supporting the assessee's claim, directing the AO to compute cash credits vis-a-vis turnover. The turnover was to be examined based on corroborative evidence, with profit taxed at 8% u/s 44AD due to lack of comparative data. The AO was instructed to verify turnover using bank statements and the assessee to provide relevant documents. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
