Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The case involves a second bail application u/s 439 Cr.P.C. for regular bail in a Money Laundering matter related to illegal levy on coal transportation. The court examined compliance with Section 19 of the PMLA, 2002 for arrest validity. The remand order was found to be in conformity with law, rejecting claims of illegal custody. The applicant failed to meet twin conditions u/s 45 of the PMLA, 2002 due to his central role in money laundering activities. Citing relevant Supreme Court judgments, bail was denied based on gravity of the offense and failure to disprove prosecution's case. The bail application was consequently rejected.
The case involves a second bail application u/s 439 Cr.P.C. for regular bail in a Money Laundering matter related to illegal levy on coal transportation. The court examined compliance with Section 19 of the PMLA, 2002 for arrest validity. The remand order was found to be in conformity with law, rejecting claims of illegal custody. The applicant failed to meet twin conditions u/s 45 of the PMLA, 2002 due to his central role in money laundering activities. Citing relevant Supreme Court judgments, bail was denied based on gravity of the offense and failure to disprove prosecution's case. The bail application was consequently rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.