Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal emphasized burden of proof on AO to allow cross-examination of third party whose documents led to addition. Failure to provide cross-examination opportunity led to deletion of alleged cash investment addition. Lack of additional evidence by Revenue and similarity to precedent case resulted in relief for the assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice.
The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal emphasized burden of proof on AO to allow cross-examination of third party whose documents led to addition. Failure to provide cross-examination opportunity led to deletion of alleged cash investment addition. Lack of additional evidence by Revenue and similarity to precedent case resulted in relief for the assessee. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to insufficient evidence and failure to adhere to principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
